Last week in Part 1 of my series on burnout, I focused on what burnout is, what causes it, and the negative impacts on your personal and professional well-being. In this installment, you will learn about individual strategies to address burnout and organizational strategies to prevent it.
An example of passive recovery might be watching tv, which seems restful since you are just sitting there. However, watching tv induces gamma waves in your brain, the highest frequency waves of all. As stated by the flow research collective, they relate to simultaneous processing from different brain areas responding to high stimulation. While you may be trying to veg out on the couch, your brain is still hard at work.
A different way to build resilience is to build grit. I wrote more about this in a previous blog, but it’s worth mentioning again here. At a very basic level, if you expose yourself to uncomfortable or challenging situations that you find your way out of, that helps build confidence and shifts the bar for what you consider stressful. It won’t change the stress you are exposed to, but it will change how you perceive that stress.
“Well-being is the foundation of sustained peak performance. Your time is fixed during the day, but the energy available is variable. To better manage energy output, you need to oscillate or switch, between energy expenditure and recovery throughout the day. “
What Can be Done at the Organizational Level?
An MIT Sloan study looking into the great resignation found that “a toxic corporate culture is by far the strongest predictor of industry-adjusted attrition and is 10 times more important than compensation in predicting turnover.” A toxic culture is typically made up of several of the burnout triggers previously mentioned, such as breakdown of community, values conflict, and unfairness. As a result, we can see how burnout is contributing to turnover, even if the study doesn’t outright list it as the top cause.
The great resignation has shown that employees and executives alike are willing to give up positions and careers to find better situations for themselves. A recent survey, however, found 72% of participants regret leaving their previous jobs. Perhaps, the answer is not to switch jobs, but to create change from within. Change begins with leadership keeping an eye out for signs of burnout, genuinely being interested in solving the problem, and being open to feedback from their employees.
Once leadership is committed to creating a better culture and work environment, a baseline needs to be established to find out what areas need improvement. This could be a casual conversation with employees, a survey tool like Maslach’s burnout inventory (MBI), or something a bit more extensive in scope like our Wellness Wave™ at Five to Flow (a proprietary diagnostic tool aimed at assessing organizational wellness).
One of the real-world companies Dr. Maslach worked with exemplified this process perfectly. They gathered data and found “unfairness” to be the second-lowest scoring category out of the burnout triggers. The executives were shocked and committed to a year of working towards addressing this problem. They followed the process outlined above and a year later their unfairness score was dramatically improved, as was the score in all five of the other categories (workload, reward, community, values, and control). There was a ripple effect that Dr. Maslach describes as being very common, and I can see why.
There are thousands of variables that will determine the individual challenges each company faces, which can take time and resources to parse out. The companies that invest in this issue, however, will gain a significant advantage over their counterparts and the people who work for those companies will enjoy their work more. Ultimately, this leads to enjoying their life outside of work more. If you want to prevent burnout and don’t know where to get started, take the Wellness Wave™ or schedule an appointment with one of our coaches today.